“Boy, do I have an opportunity for you!” are words that most United Methodist clergy have heard or will hear during their ministry. Within the next 6 weeks this phrase will be used a lot! The difficulty is that one person’s definition of “opportunity” may not match someone else’s. It is a statement usually said by district superintendents who are on the front-line of making appointments. They are at the point of the triangle between churches and clergy, matchmakers who have on-site knowledge of their churches and ministers. This knowledge is shared with the bishop’s whole cabinet, and through shared discernment, matches are made.
In the UMC system defining an “opportunity” is always a matter of perspective. It takes conferencing about the perspective of the local church and its perception of desired leadership needs; the perspective of the clergy and where they are in their ministry or the importance of family considerations; and the perspective of the bishop and cabinet who are scanning the needs of the whole annual conference and doing their very best to make disciples of Jesus Christ.
Connectionalism and working together is part and parcel of United Methodism. Therefore, appointments are made by the whole cabinet, though the Bishop alone is given constitutional authority (Par. 54, 2012 Book of Discipline) to do so after “consultation with the district superintendents.” Consultation includes local churches and clergy, too, and that appears in the form of church and clergy profiles. Therefore, everyone takes a hand, not least God, in our system of clergy deployment. Staff-Parish Relations Committees complete Church Profiles that describe the church, and clergy fill out Pastor Profiles that offer insights into their situations. By the way, both need to understand the importance of a well-presented profile. Those profiles will be pored over with microscopic attention when appointments are made. Please at least use spell-check!
A key paragraph from my perspective about appointment-making is found in Par. 428.4 which says, “All appointments shall receive consideration by the bishop, the district superintendent(s), and the cabinet as a whole until a tentative decision is made.” This fleshes out for me that our appointment-making system is a collegial effort, though the final decision indeed belongs to the bishop. As a former district superintendent who maxed out my tenure after 8 years, and one who is absolutely relishing being appointed to a thriving congregation, I think that a key word as we ramp up for the annual anxiety-laden period of possible clergy transitions is “perspective.”
The bishop and cabinet have a perspective about clergy and churches and the needs of the whole conference, and sometimes they have to make decisions about which only they know all the facts. Churches have their own unique perspective and rightly so if they can only count on one hand the number of effective ministers they have had in any given person’s lifetime. Clergy certainly have a unique perspective shaped by their family needs, and their sense of their gifts and graces and how they might be best utilized. So, what we have as we approach “appointment season” in the UMC is an “intriguing dance of perspectives,” a cooperative connectional effort to discern who goes where and who gets whom.
I pray for all those who are feeling the tensions rise in anticipation. Being on a trapeze with one hand letting go of one bar (pastor, church, friend, etc.) and willing to trust God enough to reach out for that the next bar (church, pastor, friend, etc.) is daunting, yet potentially thrilling. Throughout the whole process, as it is bathed in prayer, we absolutely must believe that God is in this enterprise, that Jesus will be glorified, however saddened or distraught we might be. In other words, we need more than a human perspective. We must affirm that a heavenly perspective is of highest importance. In our system we yield ourselves to a scary and vulnerable process not unlike the risk Jesus took in his incarnation.
So the word is “Perspective,” both divine and human. This is the essence of our belief in the system we call “itineracy,” the moving of clergy. John Wesley called itineracy the “apostolic plan of evangelization.” He thought that our “sent,” not “called” system was and is one of God’s best ways of mobilizing and energizing God’s salvific plan for humanity. I agree and have yielded myself to our peculiar process. Trust me, I haven’t always seen the wisdom of the bishop and cabinet, nor have all of my appointments been rosy. I do know this, however, that God has provided for me, my family, the local church, and the community. When we yield to a divine perspective all other perspectives come into focus!
Some people claim that their personal perspective is supreme and that their needs and/or agenda supplants and trumps everyone else’s. That’s not our system. I’ve seen people finagle their way upwards using manipulation and maneuvering, but, sooner or later, their solitary and self-promoting perspective will come to a halting stop. They have elevated what they want over saying “Yes!” and yielding. God help the UMC if that kind of personal aggrandizement ever wins the day.
Let me share a story that illustrates the illusion that getting our way and making what we think are unseen jabs is the way to go in appointment-making, whether by churches, clergy, district superintendents, and even bishops. Good appointment-making values everyone’s perspective, especially God’s. The story goes like this:
“During World War II, a general and his aide, a lieutenant, were traveling from one base to another. They were forced to travel with civilians aboard a passenger train. They found their compartments where two other folks were already seated – an attractive young lady and her grandmother. For most of the trip, they conversed freely. The train entered a long and rather dark tunnel. Once inside the tunnel, the passengers in this particular car heard two distinct sounds – the first was the smack of a kiss; the second was the loud sound of a slap.
Now, although these four people were in the same compartment aboard the passenger train, they came to four differing perspectives. The young lady thought how glad she was that the young lieutenant got up the courage to kiss her, but she was somewhat disappointed at her grandmother for slapping him for doing it; the general thought to himself how proud he was of his young lieutenant for being enterprising enough to find this opportunity to kiss the attractive young lady but was flabbergasted that she slapped him instead of the lieutenant; the grandmother was flabbergasted to think that the young lieutenant would have the gall to kiss her granddaughter, but was proud of her granddaughter for slapping him for doing it; and the young lieutenant was trying to hold back the laughter, for he found the perfect opportunity to kiss an attractive young girl and slap his superior officer all at the same time!”
Perhaps our so-called “opportunities” are not at all what they seem, or they are fleeting chances for us to “work” the system and “slap” the “Man” by bucking authority. We better be careful not to be so creative in our massaging the system that God’s video cam doesn’t catch us and we end up as our own worst enemy. I would rather trust the communal perspective of our appointment-making system than end up getting what I finagled for and be absolutely miserable. So, let’s trust everyone’s perspective, especially God’s! Everyone’s input insures a better opportunity for fruitful ministry.
Narcie, Josh, and I at Josh’s Ordination
The red Stoles represent the Yoke of Christ saying that We YIELD to where we are SENT!
17 thoughts on “Perspective and Opportunity in United Methodist Appointment-Making”
Perfectly stated, and delightfully illustrated.
Thanks, Doris! tim
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 22, 2015, at 9:22 AM, A Potter's View wrote:
Thank you for sharing this photograph of two of your children. I have your entire family in my prayers. The picture personalizes my prayers.
Alice, Thanks for the prayers! tim
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 22, 2015, at 11:19 AM, A Potter's View wrote:
Well written and SO TRUE! Be well!
Thanks, Don! Hope you’re well – miss you, tim
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 22, 2015, at 2:18 PM, A Potter's View wrote:
As an elder in the Virginia Conference, I deeply appreciate the “perspective” you offered in this post and the very humorous and educational illustration. I might just read this tonight at our SPRC meeting!
Hope you have a great meeting! tim
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 22, 2015, at 3:26 PM, A Potter's View wrote:
Tim, you always know how to get the point/message across without in very interesting, informative and might I say entertaining ways being preachy! God has truly blessed you with this gift as well as other ones.
Thanks, Beckee! tim
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 23, 2015, at 2:45 PM, A Potter's View wrote:
I wanted to let you know that after prayer, I began the SPRC meeting reading excerpts from this blog post and concluding with the illustration. Not only did the other members get a good laugh out of the story, but it was the best church meeting I have ever experienced in over 30 years of ministry! I will be using the illustration tomorrow in a sermon on forgiveness. Thanks, Tim!
Wonderful! Praise the Lord, tim
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 24, 2015, at 5:41 AM, A Potter's View wrote:
One person told me after the service today that the story of the 4 people in the dark train car was the best story she ever remembers hearing!
George, That’s super! tim
Sent from my iPad
On Jan 25, 2015, at 3:20 PM, A Potter's View wrote:
Tim, I used the story in my blog post today. Another pastor already commented that she plans to use it in a future sermon! https://monroeumc.wordpress.com/2015/01/27/01272015-perspective/
Great, George, tim
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 27, 2015, at 6:52 AM, A Potter's View wrote:
UNREPENTANT CHURCHES? BY STEVE FINNELL
Does God sanction unrepentant Christian churches? Do unrepentant Christians receive a free pass into the kingdom of God?
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) Christian churches believe that God does not required them to repent of their sins. What does the Bible teach?
1 Corinthians 6:9-10 Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, 10 nor thieves, nor covetous, nor, drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, will inherit the kingdom of God. (NKJV)
God does not welcome unrepentant Christians into His kingdom.
1 Corinthians 6:11 And such were some of you. But you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of our God (NKJV)
Paul said such were some of you.(PAST TENSE) Paul did not say such are some of you.(PRESENT TENSE)
There are many Christian churches that could be named (FDATE) fornicators, drunkards, adulterers, thieves, extortioners. Most congregations prefer not to advertise the unrepentant Christians they welcome in their churches. Most churches do not preach repentance as a condition to inherit the kingdom of God.
Can Christians be forgiven from sins after they sin as Christians? Yes. The question is; does a sinful lifestyle represent a truly repentant Christian? Will unrepentant Christians inherit the kingdom of God? The Scriptures say no. (Ephesians 5:1-5……..has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and God. (NKJV) Galatians 5:16-21….will not inherit the kingdom of God.(NKJV)
YOU ARE INVITED TO FOLLOW MY BLOG. http://steve-finnell.blogspot.com